History |
Wars & Campaigns |
►Boer
War
►First
World War
►►Western
Front
►►►Trench
Warfare: 1914-1916
►►►Allied
Offensive: 1916
►►►Allied
Offensives: 1917
►►►German
Offensive: 1918
►►►Advance
to Victory: 1918
►►Siberia
►Second
World War
►►War
Against Japan
►►North
Africa
►►Italian
Campaign
►►►Sicily
►►►Southern
Italy
►►►The
Sangro and Moro
►►►Battles
of the FSSF
►►►Cassino
►►►Liri
Valley
►►►Advance
to Florence
►►►Gothic
Line
►►►Winter
Lines
►►North-West
Europe
►►►Normandy
►►►Southern
France
►►►Channel
Ports
►►►Scheldt
►►►Nijmegen
Salient
►►►Rhineland
►►►Final
Phase
►Korean
War
►Cold
War
►Gulf
War |
Operations |
|
Battle Honours |
Boer War
First World War
Western Front
Trench Warfare: 1914-1916
Allied Offensive: 1916
►Somme, 1916 |
1
Jul-18 Nov 16 |
►Albert |
.1-13
Jul 16 |
►Bazentin |
.14-17
Jul 16 |
►Pozieres |
.23
Jul-3 Sep 16 |
►Guillemont |
.3-6
Sep 16 |
►Ginchy |
.9
Sep 16 |
►Flers-Courcelette |
15-22
Sep 16 |
►Thiepval |
26-29
Sep 16 |
►Le Transloy |
.
1-18 Oct 16 |
Allied
Offensives: 1917
►Arras 1917 |
8
Apr-4 May 17 |
►Vimy, 1917 |
.9-14
Apr 17 |
►Arleux |
28-29 Apr 17 |
►Scarpe, 1917 |
.3-4
May17 |
►Hill 70 |
.15-25
Aug 17 |
►Messines, 1917 |
.7-14
Jun 17 |
►Ypres, 1917 |
..31
Jul-10 Nov 17 |
►Pilckem |
31
Jul-2 Aug 17 |
►Langemarck, 1917 |
.16-18
Aug 17 |
►Menin Road |
.20-25
Sep 17 |
►Polygon Wood |
26
Sep-3 Oct 17 |
►Broodseinde |
.4
Oct 17 |
►Poelcapelle |
.9
Oct 17 |
►Passchendaele |
.12
Oct 17 |
►Cambrai, 1917 |
20
Nov-3 Dec 17 |
German Offensive: 1918
►Somme, 1918 |
.21
Mar-5 Apr 18 |
►St. Quentin |
.21-23
Mar 18 |
►Bapaume, 1918 |
.24-25
Mar 18 |
►Rosieres |
.26-27
Mar 18 |
►Avre |
.4
Apr 18 |
►Lys |
.9-29
Apr 18 |
►Estaires |
.9-11
Apr 18 |
►Messines, 1918 |
.10-11
Apr 18 |
►Bailleul |
.13-15
Apr 18 |
►Kemmel |
.17-19
Apr 18 |
Advance to Victory: 1918
►Arras, 1918 |
.26
Aug-3 Sep 18 |
►Scarpe, 1918 |
26-30 Aug 18. |
►Drocourt-Queant |
.2-3
Sep 18 |
►Hindenburg Line |
.12
Sep-9 Oct 18 |
►Canal du Nord |
.27
Sep-2 Oct 18 |
►St. Quentin Canal |
.29
Sep-2 Oct 18 |
►Epehy |
3-5
Oct 18 |
►Cambrai, 1918 |
.8-9
Oct 18 |
►Valenciennes |
.1-2
Nov 18 |
►Sambre |
.4
Nov 18 |
►Pursuit to Mons |
.28 Sep-11Nov |
Second World War
War Against Japan
South-East Asia
Italian Campaign
Battle of Sicily
Southern
Italy
The Sangro and Moro
Battles of the FSSF
►Anzio |
22
Jan-22 May 44 |
►Rome |
.22
May-4 Jun 44 |
►Advance
|
.22
May-22 Jun 44 |
to the Tiber |
. |
►Monte Arrestino |
25
May 44 |
►Rocca Massima |
27
May 44 |
►Colle Ferro |
2
Jun 44 |
Cassino
►Cassino II |
11-18
May 44 |
►Gustav Line |
11-18
May 44 |
►Sant' Angelo in
|
13
May 44 |
Teodice |
. |
►Pignataro |
14-15 May 44 |
Liri Valley
►Hitler Line |
18-24 May 44 |
►Melfa Crossing |
24-25 May 44 |
►Torrice Crossroads |
30
May 44 |
Advance to Florence
Gothic Line
►Gothic Line |
25 Aug-22 Sep 44 |
►Monteciccardo |
27-28 Aug 44 |
►Point 204 (Pozzo Alto) |
31 Aug 44 |
►Borgo Santa Maria |
1 Sep 44 |
►Tomba di Pesaro |
1-2 Sep 44 |
Winter Lines
►Rimini Line |
14-21 Sep 44 |
►San Martino- |
14-18 Sep 44 |
San Lorenzo |
. |
►San Fortunato |
18-20 Sep 44 |
►Sant' Angelo |
11-15 Sep 44 |
in Salute |
. |
►Bulgaria Village |
13-14 Sep 44 |
►Pisciatello |
16-19 Sep 44 |
►Savio Bridgehead |
20-23
Sep 44 |
►Monte La Pieve |
13-19
Oct 44 |
►Monte Spaduro |
19-24 Oct 44 |
►Monte San Bartolo |
11-14
Nov 44 |
►Lamone Crossing |
2-13
Dec 44 |
►Capture of Ravenna |
3-4
Dec 44 |
►Naviglio Canal |
12-15 Dec 44 |
►Fosso Vecchio |
16-18 Dec 44 |
►Fosso Munio |
19-21 Dec 44 |
►Conventello- |
2-6 Jan 45 |
Comacchio |
. |
Northwest Europe
Battle of Normandy
►Quesnay Road |
10-11 Aug 44 |
►St. Lambert-sur- |
19-22 Aug 44 |
Southern France
Channel Ports
The Scheldt
Nijmegen Salient
Rhineland
►The
Reichswald |
8-13 Feb 45 |
►Waal
Flats |
8-15 Feb 45 |
►Moyland
Wood |
14-21 Feb 45 |
►Goch-Calcar
Road |
19-21 Feb 45 |
►The
Hochwald |
26
Feb- |
. |
4
Mar 45 |
►Veen |
6-10 Mar 45 |
►Xanten |
8-9
Mar 45 |
Final Phase
►The
Rhine |
23
Mar-1 Apr 45 |
►Emmerich-Hoch
|
28
Mar-1 Apr 45 |
Elten |
. |
Korean War
|
Domestic Missions |
►FLQ
Crisis |
International
Missions |
►ICCS
Vietnam 1973
►MFO
Sinai 1986- |
Peacekeeping |
►UNTEA |
W. N. Guinea 1963-1964 |
►ONUCA |
C. America
1989-1992 |
►UNTAC |
Cambodia
1992-1993 |
►UNMOP |
Prevlaka
1996-2001 |
|
Exercises |
|
The Seine, 1944
The Seine, 1944 was a Battle Honour granted to units participating in the
final battles of the Battle of Normandy, during the drive to the River Seine. This was the final battle of the initial campaign the
Canadian Army fought in North-West Europe during the Second World War.
Background
Following the defeat of the German
Armies in the Falaise Gap, General Montgomery’s plan for the pursuit
of the beaten army was to get Allied forces across the River Seine
with great urgency, if possible effecting a second encirclement,
with U.S. forces cutting off forces by sweeping up the left bank of
the river. First Canadian Army was ordered to cross the Seine and
clear the Le Havre peninsula, and the port itself. On 19 August,
General Crerar, commanding 1st Canadian Army, issued orders to the
two corps under his command and by 23 August the Army was fully on
the move: 1st
British Corps on an axis Lisieux-Pont Audemer and 2nd Canadian Corps
along the line Trun-Vimoutiers-Orbec-Bemay-Elbeuf/Louviers. The
British experienced heavy fighting, particularly at the River
Touques, but by the 24th were across the River and advancing on
Honfleur while 2nd Canadian Corps captured Bernay the same day,
advancing against mostly “insignificant” opposition with the 2nd
Division on the left, the 3rd Division in the centre and the 4th
Division on the right. The corps armoured corps unit, with the
divisional reconnaissance regiments, led the advance.1 |
|
Before the Normandy invasion, First Canadian
Army had studied the tactical problem of an assault crossing of the
lower Seine River.2 As early as 21 August, however, the
envisioned Operation AXEHEAD was called off, and an American bridgehead
created at Mantes-Gassicourt was to be exploited by the British. The 8th
British Corps was in fact at this time grounded for lack of transport -
its trucks were being used to move the rest of First Canadian Army.
This symbolizes the greatest Allied
problem in the phase now beginning—that of getting sufficient
supplies to the forward troops to maintain the advance. The Allies
were outrunning their maintenance; they had no ports close to the
area they were now entering, and as the armies rushed forward the
lines of supply back to the Normandy beaches and ports were
lengthening hourly.3

The First Canadian Army now turned its
attention to completing the destruction of enemy forces within its
boundary, between the sea and the west bank of the Seine, after which it
was to cross the River and advance on an axis from Rouen towards Ypres.
Enemy Forces
Opposite the First Canadian Army was the German 5th Panzer Army, with
the 86th Corps on the channel coast, and the 1st SS Panzer Corps to
their left, on the inland flank. On 20 August 1944, Hitler ordered the
Commander-in-Chief West (OB West) to hold a bridgehead west of Paris,
prevent a breakthrough between the Seine and the Loire west of Paris,
reform the 5th Panzer Army and the 7th Army behind the Touques River,
and, if the area west of the Seine could not be held, to fall back to
defend the a line running from the River Seine - River Yonne - Canal de
Bourgogne - Dijon - Dole to the Swiss border. (The Canadian official
historian notes that on a small scale map, this line is a relatively
straight one.) Hitler was not flexible on the possibility of abandoning
the bridgehead south of the Seine at Paris, which was to be defended "at
all costs" and with no regard for material damage to the city itself.

Contemporary situation map from 1st U.S.
Army Group - situation as of 1200hrs 25 Aug 1944
German forces from the channel coast to the
boundary of the 1st Army at Poissy, west of Paris, were under the
command of 5th Panzer Army, and its component formations had been badly
mauled in Normandy. Three corps were under command; the 86th nearest the
coast, 2nd SS Panzer Corps further inland, and the 81st on its left
flank. OB West emphasized to his commanders the need to withdraw forces
across the Seine safely; concentration of armour northeast of Le
Neubourg had prevented an Allied breakthrough along the Seine, even
despite the eviction of German covering forces at Vernon.
...in fact the
Germans succeeded in preventing their retiring
forces being cut off and encircled in the manner planned by the Allied commanders. The American
sweep penetrated to Louviers and Elbeuf — fine advance - but not "beyond". The British and
Canadians had now drawn level with the Americans; and the
enemy's resistance had suddenly stiffened. On the threshold of his river crossings west
of Elbeuf he fought a very effective rearguard action.
On 25 August, it appears, the 331st
German Infantry Division was made responsible, under the 81st Corps, for covering the
withdrawal across the Seine in the Rouen area. This was a good division commanded by
Colonel Walter Steinmuller. It had been under the Fifteenth Army north of the Seine
until early August, when it was moved south. It did not become involved in the disaster of
the Pocket, but took part in the general retreat to the Seine and in it lost one of its
three grenadier regiments. It now found itself defending a line west of Bourgtheroulde, while
behind it a great mass of German armoured and other vehicles stood waiting to cross
the river. Its task was to cover the crossings about Rouen and Duclair, at the tops of the
two great loops of the Seine north and east of Bourgtheroulde. It was very evident
that Steinmuller's division would not in itself be equal to this. Accordingly, on the
afternoon of the 25th Fifth Panzer Army directed Lieut.-General Graf von Schwerin,
commanding the tank force that had been collected north-east of Le Neubourg, to form two
armoured groups, one from the remnants of the 2nd and 9th S.S. Panzer Divisions, and
the other from those of the 21st and 116th Panzer Divisions, to block the necks of the
river loops south of Rouen and south of Duclair.4
On 25 August,
the day that French spearheads were liberating Paris, the 2nd U.S. Armored
Division spearheaded the First United States Army's drive into Elbeuf,
contacting units of the 4th Canadian (Armoured) Division near Le
Neubourg, as well as units of the British 7th Armoured Division west of
Elbeuf. The British and Canadians relieved them in their corridor or
advance along the south bank of the Seine.

Missions
The specific task of 2nd Canadian Corps was
to prepare for opposed crossing of the Seine between Pont de l'Arche and
Elbeuf, with subsequent bridgeheads to be secured as necessary above and
below Rouen, then to establish the corps in the area north of Rouen and
prepare to advanced towards Dieppe, while the 1st British Corps secured
the Havre peninsula. The day after General Crerar, commanding 1st
Canadian Army, announced these missions, General Montgomery, commanding
21st Army Group, sent new directives.
1.
The enemy has now been driven north of the Seine except in a few
places, and our troops have entered Paris. The enemy forces are very
stretched and disorganized; they are in no fit condition to stand
and fight us.
2.
This, then, is our opportunity to achieve our further objects
quickly, and to deal the enemy further heavy blows which will
cripple his power to continue in the war.
3.
The tasks now confronting 21 Army Group are:
(a) To operate northwards and to destroy the enemy forces in
N.E. France and Belgium.
(b) to secure the Pas de Calais area and the airfields in
Belgium.
(c) to secure Antwerp as a base.
4.
Having completed these tasks, the eventual mission of the Army Group
will be to advance eastwards on the Ruhr.
5.
Speed of action and of movement is now vital. I cannot emphasize
this too strongly; what we have to do must be done quickly. Every
officer and man must understand that by a stupendous effort now we
shall not only hasten the end of the war; we shall also bring quick
relief to our families and friends in England by over-running the
flying bomb launching sites in the Pas de Calais.
Intention
6.
To destroy all enemy forces in the Pas de Calais and Flanders, and
to capture Antwerp.
First Canadian Army was mentioned
specifically in paragraph 10:
10. Having crossed the Seine the Army will operate northwards, will
secure the port of Dieppe, and will proceed quickly with the
destruction of all enemy forces in the coastal belt up to Bruges.
11. One Corps will be turned westwards into the Havre peninsula, to
destroy the enemy forces in that area and to secure the port of
Havre. No more forces will be employed in this task than are
necessary to achieve the object. The main business lies to the
north, and in the Pas de Calais.
The Army was ordered to operate by using
maneuvers to the inland flank and "right hooks". The 6th Airborne
Division (with 1st Canadian Parachute Battalion) was to be withdrawn
into strategic reserve in the United Kingdom by 6 September. The British
7th Armoured Division was to return to British 2nd Army, the latter
formation which was gearing up to cross the Seine and drive ahead into
Belgium with all possible speed. At this time, the 1st Allied Airborne
Army being assembled in England was scheduled for an airborne drop on
the Pas de Calais, ahead of an anticipated Canadian drive into the area.
The directive concluded:
24. The enemy has not the troops to hold any strong position. The
proper tactics now are for strong armoured and mobile columns to
by-pass enemy centres of resistance and to push boldly ahead,
creating alarm and despondency in enemy rear areas. Enemy centres of
resistance thus by-passed should be dealt with by infantry columns
coming onlater.
25. I rely on commanders of every rank and grade to "drive" ahead
with the utmost energy; any tendency to be "sticky" or cautious must
be stamped on ruthlessly.
The Canadian Army's official history summed
up the situation as follows:
At the time when this directive was
issued there seemed to be no limit to the possibilities of the
situation. The only apparent cloud on the horizon was the supply
problem. The news of the liberation of Paris had just electrified
the world. A rising in the city forced the Supreme Commander's hand,
and Allied troops, including General Leclerc's 2nd French Armoured
Division, had entered the city early on 25 August, and that day the
tactical headquarters of the 5th U.S. Corps of the First U.S. Army
was established at the Gare Montparnasse. The same day the Second
British Army made contact south-west of Le Neubourg with the 19th
U.S. Corps which had advanced across their front, and the 43rd
(Wessex) Division reached the Seine at Vernon (where the Americans
advancing along the left bank had arrived some days before) and
established a small bridgehead in the face of resistance from the
enemy on the north bank. On 25 August also First Canadian Army made
contact with the First U.S. Army at several points north and
north-east of Le Neubourg, and subsequently reported, `By last light
our forces were within striking distance of the Seine crossings and
formations of the 2nd Canadian Corps were preparing their individual
attacks." At 5 p.m. on 26 August the scout platoon and "D" Company
of The Lincoln and Welland Regiment, using shovels as paddles to
propel a small, boat, crossed the Seine near Criquebeuf, above
Elbeuf, and took up a position on the far shore. They were the first
Canadians across the river.5
4th Canadian (Armoured)
Division
The Lincoln and Welland Regiment began their
pursuit to the Seine on 23 August, embussing in Troop Carrying Vehicles
(TCV), with the mortar, carrier, and anti-tank platoons riding their
Universal Carriers into action. The Pioneer Platoon was using an M7
"Priest" vehicle loaned to the Regiment during the Falaise Gap battle,
originally intended to carry supplies to Polish troops cut of near
Chambois, the Pioneer Platoon instead retained it for the remainder of
the war. Their column followed a path from Fresnay-le-Samson to Le Sap.
...but between Le Sap and Monnai the
Brigade column encountered an anti-tank screen. This was to be a
familiar feature of the enemy's tactics for the next month: he would
deploy a small force possessing plenty of automatic weapons; this
force would then halt the brigade column, oblige it to get off the
highway, deploy, and probe forward. By morning the screen would
usually be gone, but the enemy would have gained time.6

The Algonquin Regiment, who with the rest of
the 4th Canadian (Armoured) Division had only been deployed to
North-West Europe for less than a month, found this phase of the
campaign both an interesting test, and a validation, of its
organization:
The mortar platoon had not had a great
deal of employment (in recent days)...From now on, however, they
were to take a larger and more important part in the battalion's
operation. Our pioneers had periodically been called upon for
mine-sweeping tasks and for assistance in maintaining bridge-sites,
but again their full resources had not been called into play. The
anti-tank lads had had a few good shoots, and had performed a strong
part in our defensive perimeters. Unlike the other specialist
platoons, their work was to go into virtual eclipse for a time
during the pursuit phase, and while the fighting over the polders
was in progress, but their day too was to return. All in all,
Support Company was to prove a reliable mainstay for the weakened
rifle companies in the month or so ahead.
Operationally, the battalion had shaken
down into a much smoother-working unit. Bit by bit, all unnecessary
frills in transport and supply were being sloughed off; most actions
had been reduced to a drill; and while the supply end had not as yet
worked to everyone's satisfaction, the C.O. was making experiment
after experiment to hit upon a smooth combination. Tactically, about
every situation in the book had been met, not always successfully,
it is true, but with a spirit that boded well for later operations.
One thing that had been learned well already was the priceless value
of good and timely information. To this end the scout platoon had
been given overtime work, and were to be given more, while the
intelligence section was also called upon for wider and wider scope
in its tasks.7
The history of The Algonquin Regiment
mentions that the 4th Armoured Brigade had done preliminary work for the
advance of the three Canadian divisions by reconnoitring the Vie River,
both to scout for Allied crossing locations and to deny crossings to the
enemy.8 However, the South Alberta Regiment's history
mentions only that on 22 August 1944, the Regiment was relieved in place
in its positions at Hill 117 following the Falaise Gap fighting, and was
promised that it would do little fighting - a tantalizing promise given
the number of tanks it had lost in the Falaise battle, and the "dozens
of others, less badly damaged and repairable, scattered among various
workshops."9 The Canadian Grenadier Guards' history described
their own advance:
The 4th Canadian Armoured Division took
the right of the 2nd Canadian Corps, adjoining the Second British
Army. On our left were the 3rd and 2nd Canadian Divisions which had
made a left wheel in the Trun area and were now directed on Rouen,
and between the latter and the Channel were the four British
divisions of the 1st British Corps then under command of the First
Canadian Army - the 6th Airborne, the 7th Armoured, the 49th West
Riding and the 51st Highland.
At the start, we were heading for
Broglie twenty miles away, the South Albertas and the (British
Columbia Regiment) were in the lead; we were well back in the line
of march - even behind Brigade Headquarters. The roads through the
wooded hills from Champsoult, across the narrow valley of La Vie, up
through the orchards and steep ravines by Roiville, and down again
to the bridge over the Touques at Orville, were lined on both sides
with wrecked German vehicles.
The R.A.F. had done a thorough job, as
had the heavy armoured bulldozers at the head of the column. Shortly
before noon, nearing le Sap, we heard that a German rearguard had
held up the column near Bavigni six miles ahead on the highway to
Broglie. The B.C.R. had lost several tanks when confronted by a road
block of heavy trees flanked by 88-mm guns concealed in the woods on
both sides. The Lake Superiors had to deploy and clear the
obstruction while we followed the Foot Guards in a flanking movement
along a parallel route to the north, through St. Germain l'Aunai and
le Coudrai to laager at nightfall a mile west of la Goulafriere.
At first light on the 24th, No. 2
(Squadron) moved north for two miles through woods and orchards to
la Folletiere Abenon, and at 7:30 we received warning that the
advance would continue. The Regiment reassembled...and at 12:45
moved off...
This day of liberation was a joyous
holiday for the thousands of civilians who lined the route, waving,
clapping hands and smiling as each vehicle passed, crowding around
whenever we halted, shaking hands, presenting us with wine and
flowers. The crews reciprocated with cigarettes, chocolate and hard
tack - all luxuries in great demand.10
The Lincoln and Welland Regiment partially deployed in front of the
German anti-tank screen when it received orders to advanced north to
Marcaire as flank protection for the division, and to threaten the
German anti-tank screen. The battalion remained concentrated through a
wet night and moved again on 24 August over soggy roads where it
rejoined the divisional column between Monnai and Broglie. The division
was on the move again to Bernay, where once again an enemy rearguard was
holding out on the northern edge. On 25 August the L&W moved to
Fontaine-la-Soret, following the diversion of the column to a Bailey
bridging site, but at 05:30hrs the bridge was still not ready and the
battalion had to wait until 13:30hrs before it could cross the Risle.
The column stopped only twice as it continued on through Le Neubourg,
Crosville-la-Vielle, Criquebeuf-la-Campagne, Daubeuf-la-Campagne and La
Haye Malherbe. At 18:30hrs, the Lincoln and Wellands,with support from a
squadron of The South Alberta Regiment, a platoon of machine guns of The
New Brunswick Rangers, and a troop of 20mm anti-aircraft guns from the
8th Light Anti-Aircraft Regiment, concentrated at La Haye Malherbe while
a patrol of five reconnaissance tanks, a section of carriers and part of
the Scout Platoon went out to reconnoitre a path to the River Seine.11
(On 24 August General) Simonds had
ordered Harry Foster's 4th Armoured Division to seize "by
coup-de-main" a bridgehead in the area of Criquebeuf. During the
evening of 25 August the Lincoln and Welland Regiment, which was
leading the 10 Brigade column, arrived at La Haye Malherbe, a few
miles south of the river and, at 2000 hours, the Link's scout
platoon accompanied by Lieutenant Wally Young's troop from A
Squadron (of The South Alberta Regiment) and five Stuarts from Recce
Troop moved forward to find a route to the Seine. It was too dark to
do much that night but the next morning Young's troop and the Recce
tanks accompanied the Links as they occupied Criquebeuf-sur-Seine
without fighting. The Germans, however, occupied a strong position
on high ground on the north bank of the river and, as the engineers
began to construct a bridge to a low-lying island in the Seine, they
came under heavy shelling.12
The Germans
enjoyed an excellent view into Criquebeuf from heights on the north bank
of the river. "A" and "B" Companies of the Lincoln and Welland set up on
the river's edge along with two platoons of "C" Company, while "D"
Company and the remainder of "C" Company held the rear of the town while
the battalion's command post set up in a school and "F" Echelon moved up
from La Haye Malherbe. The shelling stopped work on bridge construction
on the south bank, preventing work on a span being pushed out to a small
island in the middle of the stream. The battalion 3-inch mortars began
returning fire across the Seine along with the attached anti-aircraft
guns, "but casualties in Criquebeuf were unexpectedly severe."13
At 17:00hrs on 26
August, a patrol from the Scout Platoon was sent across the Seine to
test enemy alertness and the possibility of crossing by boat; they
managed to reach the north bank in a small craft propelled by shovels.
They returned with a report of no opposition and "D" Company began to
paddle across, again with shovels, in the same boat to establish a
bridgehead in the hamlet of Freneuse. The lead platoon was established
at 19:30hrs and the entire company was across shortly after dark. The
enemy was still not aware that the river had been crossed when the first
enemy patrol appeared at midnight. At first light on the 27th, the
Argylls and Algonquins began to cross the Seine as well.14
On the morning of 27 August the
infantry of the 4th Division began to cross the Seine, using stormboats, to develop
the small bridgehead already held by The Lincoln and Welland Regiment opposite
Criquebeuf. The 10th Infantry Brigade met heavy opposition and
suffered severe casualties in attempting to enlarge this, and failed to capture the high ground
north of Sottevillesous-le-Val and Igoville during the day. It
was evident that the Germans-here, the 17th
Luftwaffe
Field Division–intended to do their utmost to block
any advance on Rouen from this direction. The intention of putting the 4th
Division's armoured brigade across the river in this area was abandoned, and on 28 August it crossed
at Elbeuf, where there was a more secure bridgehead.15
The morning of the
27th was misty, providing cover for the crossing, and the Algonquins
were ordered to assault Hill 88, and the Argylls Hill 95, both
dominating features overlooking the crossing site at Criquebeuf. "D"
Company of the Lincoln and Welland had meanwhile contacted The Canadian
Scottish Regiment of the 3rd Canadian Division, who had made a crossing
farther west. "F" Echelon of the Argylls took a wrong turn at Igoville
and their Intelligence Section, Adjutant, and signals equipment drove
into German captivity; an immediate attack by the Argylls was not able
to prevent their evacuation.16
The Algonquin Regiment began crossing the river by ferry.
The objectives for (The
Algonquin Regiment) were, first, the town of Sotteville-sous-le-val,
and next, the prominent hill feature, Point 88, behind and to the
right of the town. The Argylls, crossing next, were to get into the
twin town of Igoville and assault Point 95, on the same high ground
feature. Between the actual river and the towns there was a flat
plateau, with a railroad embankment about halfway across,
paralleling the river. The roads to the towns ran under this
embankment through tunnels. The entire plateau was under complete
observation, and had the Germans elected, or had they the forces to
defend the crossing, this would have been a very hot spot indeed. As
it was, they opposed the actual crossing with shellfire only, and
the leading troops got over without casualties and made for the
reorganization point at the embankment.
"D" Company, leading, now
attempted to get over the embankment into the town. Cpl. Ellenwood,
M.M....had already sneaked around by a westerly route into
Sotteville, but two other scouts were fired on at once, and a
grenade duel over the embankment began. Covered by artillery fire,
furnished by courtesy of Capt. Jack Forbes of the 15 Field Regiment,
all three platoons got over the obstacle into some low scrub on the
far side. There was still 400 yards of open ground to cross, but the
enemy was already ranging on "D's" position and it was urgent to get
away from the embankment. A mad dash by (two) platoons...was
ordered, covered by fire from 17 Platoon...
Moving in
perfect discipline in open order, the two platoons gained the
outskirts, although raked by machine-gun fire all the way. Six
casualties were suffered on the way in, but the company escaped by
seconds a heavy concentration of mortar fire on the point they had
just left.
The third
Platoon now suffered badly as it tried to join the rest. Lieutenant
Mageau was wounded, and Private G.A. Burnett, commanding a "suicide
section" to get the rest of his platoon across, was killed, after
accounting for most of the machine-gun crew that was holding them
up.
The
clearing of the town proceeded then. Imagine the astonishment of the
company when, on reaching the main east-west roads they found
Corporal Ellenwood and Private Edgar, another scout, calmly guarding
about a dozen prisoners. They themselves had been captured a few
minutes before, but on the approach of the rest of the Algonquins,
the Germans had elected to switch roles.
"B" Company
now passed through "D" Company in an effort to take Point 88. "A"
Company had been originally ordered to make a foothold in Igoville,
about 500 yards to the east, but, in miscounting the railroad
underpasses with were landmarks, the company got into the east end
of Sotteville instead. This was fortunate for them, because it took
a full-scale battalion attack for the Argylls to get into this town,
and they did not do so until they had taken almost eighty
casualties. As soon as our leading troops had penetrated into
Sotteville, a counter-attack by fire began, and the casualties
started to mount. "B" Company's attack was halted just beyond the
town, when a German self-propelled gun...appeared and fired at
point-blank range at the infantry toiling up the slope. The gun was
moving down the slope, accompanied by two armoured half-track troop
carriers. This force evidently formed the mobile reserve of the
German rearguard party, and once we had disclosed our main point of
main effort, they had arrived to smash it. In the general
disorganization caused by this surprise, it is possible that the
enemy force might have ousted us from Sotteville. But in the nick of
time, Corporal "Pee-wee" Lafontaine of "B" Company, assisted by
Lance Corporal A.C. Brightman, crawling to a vantage point, knocked
out the gun with a well-placed P.I.A.T. bomb. The counter-attack,
robbed of its chief fire-power, collapsed and although the high
ground was not yet taken, we remained solid in the town.17
The Algonquins spent the rest of the day and
night under heavy fire from the opposite side of the hill, having lost
five killed and 22 wounded. They had witnessed the Argyll's command
group pass through them and into enemy hands, despite (according to
their regimental history) protests from soldiers of the Algonquins. The
Carrier Platoon of the Argylls had also suffered heavily from German
anti-tank fire.
Early on the morning of 28 April, a
two-battalion attack was ordered on the two hills, to go behind a full
artillery preparation complete with smoke. The Algonquins and Argylls
stepped off at 07:30hrs against mainly light opposition. A German SP gun
on the flank caused concern, and Hill 95 proved to be stubbornly
defended. Both hills were in Canadian hands by last light and next
morning, the high ground overlooking the river was secure. On 29 August,
the enemy did not show himself to units of the 10th Infantry Brigade.18
2nd Canadian Division
The 2nd Canadian Division had encountered
German resistance as it advanced from their positions at the end of the
Falaise fighting. At St. Germain-la-Campagne, The Calgary Highlanders
were obliged to launch a four-company attack to assist Les Fusiliers
Mont-Royal.19
The Division took Bourgtherould the next
day, 26 August, when The Black Watch battled snipers and anti-tank guns
in the town.20
As it
advanced on the Seine, (the 2nd Division) collided with the fresh
331st German Infantry Division which was covering the approaches to
Rouen from the Forêt de la Londe. Faulty intelligence led Major
General Foulkes to believe that the forest was only lightly held.
Events were to show how wrong he was. The 4th Brigade entered the
forest from the south and the 6th from the west and north. The enemy
were skillfully dug in and well supported by the superb German
mortars. With bad weather limiting air support and artillery fire
comparatively ineffective in the woods the infantry struggled
forward against an enemy they couldn't see. Trying to keep direction
and pinpoint an elusive enemy in a gloomy, dripping woods made for a
miserable and costly campaign.
For three
days 2nd Division struggled in vain. Then on the night 28/29 August
the bulk of the enemy slipped across the river with the rearguard
escaping on the 30th just before the 3rd Division capture Rouen and
blocked any further withdrawal.21
A separate battle
honour was awarded for the Forêt de la Londe fighting, and the fighting
there is described in detail in a separate article.

Canadians of The Royal
Hamilton Light Infantry meet up with Americans of the
2nd U.S. Armored Division in Elbeuf on 27 August 1944.
From left to right; Capt. A.A. Smith (Salt Lake City, UT),
Sergeant. K.C. Lingen (Waterdown, ON), 1st Sgt. L.R.
Huntingdon (Durango, CO). Corporal J.E. Juras
(Saginaw, MI), Private W.R. Burns (Montreal, QC), Lt.
Clair Jones (Pueblo, CO).
3rd Canadian Division
General Simonds
had ordered all three divisions to attempt "coup-de-main" crossings of
the Seine on the morning of 25 August, confirming the orders that
evening. While the 4th (Armoured) Division had been directed to the area
between Pont de l'Arche and Criquebeuf, the 3rd
Division was directed to likewise seize a bridgehead to include Elbeuf and the
railway bridge at Port du Gravier to the north, precipitating an advance on Neufchatel.22
The North Shore
(New Brunswick) Regiment approached the river on the 26th, taking mortar
fire near Le Perey and capturing an outpost along with five Germans. "A"
Company lost three men getting into the village, which was secure by
02:00hrs on the 27th, and "B" Company had reported La Capelle clear at
22:00hrs on the 26th. The battalion held up on the 27th while patrol
went out to locate the Chaudières, though patrols failed to located them
either that day or the next.
It was now
known that the Seine was just ahead and was to be crossed on the
29th. "The closer we got to the Seine," wrote Lt.-Col. O.L. Corbett,
"the stiffer became the rearguard actions. A few miles from Elbeuf
we hit infantry plus tanks. The enemy tanks started to disengage as
soon as our men fought their way into the back gardens and houses of
the village. One interesting item in this action was that
seventy-five percent of the enemy dead had a bullet wound in the
head - our lads picked them off as they peeked around corners. This
is good shooting in any man's army. We received orders to move in at
first light and capture Elbeuf. "D" Company led this attack. Lt.
Bart Staple's platoon swung around through the fields and hit the
rear of the town at the same time Lt. Smith's platoon came in on the
main street. The timing worked out well and the enemy offered little
resistance. We had reached the Seine.
The North
Shore was across the Seine by 0930 hours on the 29th and at once
took up the pursuit of the enemy. "The Divisional Reconnaissance had
come into its own and fanned out ahead probing for enemy resistance
and road blocks," said Major Corbett. "The battalions of the 3rd
Canadian Division were formed into miniature battle groups, each
with a troop of tanks, a battery of artillery and some engineers.
Every available means of transport was used."23
Other units of the
division had crossed the Seine earlier:
The 3rd Division in fact
had met little opposition in ferrying itself across the river ... on the 27th; the enemy evidently had no troops to spare to try to keep us out of the low-lying river loop opposite
Elbeuf, but was content to concentrate on holding the high ground beginning some four miles
east, which commanded both the approaches from Elbeuf and the 10th Brigade's
bridgehead. The 9th Field Squadron R.C.E., working under shell and mortar fire, got two
tank-carrying rafts into operation at Elbeuf before nightfall, and early the next morning
the 8th G.H.Q. Troops Royal Engineers completed a Bailey pontoon bridge also capable of
carrying tanks.24
Once
across, "C" and "D" Companies of the Regina Rifles encountered
resistance at Tourville, and The Canadian Scottish were stopped on the
right flank of the 7th Brigade. On the 28th, a brigade attack was
ordered on the high ground behind Tourville, bypassing the enemy held
town. The Reginas fought through a wood onto their objectives in the
town. losing 12 men and capturing 42.25
The brigade attack on Tourville and the heights beyond on August
28 met with little opposition. The Germans had been forced to
abandon hundreds of vehicles and a terrific amount of warlike stores
they could not take across the river, and it became increasingly
obvious that their retreat was beginning to resemble a rout. The
mass of wrecked and abandoned vehicles around Elbeuf served as an
indication of the difficulties under which the enemy was operating,
or trying to operate, and the comparative ease with which the 3rd
Division established itself across the Seine promised greater
results farther north.26
Aftermath
While
the enemy had managed to inflict a defeat on the 2nd Division at the
Forêt de la Londe, German losses in their withdrawal across the Seine
were severe. Concentrations of vehicles at the crossings were easy
targets for Allied airpower, when the weather permitted, and when the
Luftwaffe came up to fight on 25 August, they lost 77 of their
aircraft in aerial combat to the U.S. 9th Air Force (with 49 more lost
on the ground). Artillery fire added to the chaos. In a region from
Lisieux/Vimoutiers east to the Seine, from Louviers to Quillebeuf,
British operational researchers studying what they called "the Chase"
tallied 3,648 vehicles and guns (including 150 tanks and self-propelled
guns), noting the total was incomplete, and the largest mass was on the
south bank of the Seine at Rouen where 20 AFVs, 48 guns and 660 other
vehicles lay abandoned or destroyed. They figured on a grand total south
of the river of 12,000 motor vehicles.
The
5th Panzer Army, however, recorded that between 20 August and evening on
the 24th, some 25,000 vehicles (including horse-drawn transport) had
been withdrawn over the Seine, taking advantage of bad weather
prevailing for most of this period. When good weather returned on the
24th, it is believed the greatest damage was done. Some bridges may have
been in operation, including the railway bridge at Rouen and small
pontoon bridges at Poses and Elbeuf, but most crossings were done by
ferry, many of which were also destroyed during the fighting. British
investigators concluded that 24 separated crossing sites had been used,
the most heavily trafficked being a pontoon bridge at Poses, four miles
east of Pont l'Arche, where a civilian counted 16,000 vehicles crossing
it during a period of five nights and three days. It seemed that the
Germans dismantled the bridge during daylight hours to hide it from
view; there was no road there and no peacetime bridge site to attract
attention.
The
German 74th Corps had taken over the Forêt de la Londe area from the
81st Corps, its infantry facilitating the withdrawal of the armour, and
the last elements of the 331st Division crossed in apparent good order
early in the morning of 30 August, the last Germans to cross the Seine.
The German withdrawal across the Seine
provides a good example of the application of the related military principles of
Concentration and Economy of Force. Carried out by an army which had just suffered a
catastrophic defeat and enormous losses in personnel and material, it must be accounted a
fine achievement. The forces available to the German command were small, but they
were used where they could be employed to the best advantage. The most essential
crossings were effectively covered, and by hard fighting and effective use of ground
the Germans held up our advance until the great body of their surviving troops had got
away. But what they had achieved was only a successful local delaying action.
Their strength was quite unequal to the prolonged defence of the Seine line which Hitler
had demanded. The next phase would see them retiring rapidly far to the north and
east in search of a position where the situation could be
stabilized.27
Battle Honour
The following Canadian units were awarded the Battle Honour "Seine,
1944"
for participation in these actions:
2nd Canadian Division
7th Canadian Infantry Brigade
8th Canadian Infantry Brigade
10th Canadian Infantry Brigade
Notes
-
Stacey, C.P. Official History of
the Canadian Army in the Second World War: Volume III: The Victory
Campaign: The Operations in North-west Europe 1944-45 (Queen's Printer, Ottawa, ON, 1960)
-
The Calgary Highlanders were one unit that had
"officers and NCOs trained for amphibious assaults" on strength as
late as October 31, when the Slooe Channel operation at Walcheren
Causeway called for a storm boat crossing. Copp, Terry The Brigade: The Fifth Canadian
Infantry Brigade 1939-1945 (Fortress Publications, Stoney
Creek, ON, 1992) ISBN 0-919195-16-4 p.156
-
Stacey, Ibid
-
Copp, Ibid, p.110 and Stacey, Ibid
-
Stacey, Ibid
-
Rogers, R.L.
HIstory of the Lincoln and Welland Regiment (2nd Printing October 1979) p.164
-
Cassidy, G.L. Warpath: From
Tilly-la-Campagne to the Küsten Canal (Ryerson Press,
Toronto, ON, 1948) PaperJacks Edition 1980 ISBN 0-7701-0147-X
p.142
-
Ibid, p.143
-
Graves, Donald E.
South Albertas: A Canadian Regiment at War, (Robin
Brass Studio, Toronto, ON, 1998) p.186
-
Duguid, Fortescue History of the Canadian
Grenadier Guards 1760-1964 (Gazette Printing Company,
Montreal, PQ, 1965) pp.286-287
-
Rogers, Ibid, pp.164-165
-
Graves, Ibid, p.188
-
Rogers, Ibid, pp.165-166
-
Ibid, p.166
-
Stacey, Ibid
-
Rogers, Ibid, pp.166-167
-
Cassidy, Ibid, pp.147-148. Lafontaine was killed
shortly after. The regimental history mentions an award for the
Military Medal being made posthumously, but there is no mention
of this award in Blatherwick, John and Hugh Halliday. Courage &
Service: Second World War Awards to Canadians (Service
Publications, Ottawa, ON) ISBN 1894581229. There is also no mention
of the award in William John Lynnsay Lafontaine's entry at the
Canadian Virtual War Memorial. Lance Corporal Brightman was
wounded in the action. Both had been assisted by Corporal George
Bowman, a section leader in "A" Company, who had also gotten a
shot off at the SP gun with a PIAT, before being killed by enemy
fire.
-
Ibid pp.149-150
-
Copp, Ibid, p.110
-
Stacey, Ibid
-
McKay, A. Donald Gaudeamus Igitur
"Therefore Rejoice" (Bunker to Bunker Books,
Calgary, AB, 2005) ISBN 1894255534 p.181
-
Stacey, Ibid
-
Bird, Will R. North Shore (New Brunswick)
Regiment (Brunswick Press, 1963) pp.390-393
-
Stacey, Ibid
-
Brown, Gordon and Terry Copp Look to Your
Front...Regina Rifles: A Regiment at War: 1944-45
(Laurier Centre for Military Strategic and Disarmament Studies,
Wilfrid Laurier University, 2001) ISBN 0-9688750-0-9 p.125
-
Roy, Reginald H. Ready for the Fray (Deas
gu Cath): The History of The Canadian Scottish Regiment
(Princess Mary's) (Bunker to Bunker Publishing, Calgary,
AB, 2002) ISBN 1-894255-11-9 p.311
-
Stacey, Ibid
|