History |
Wars & Campaigns |
►Boer
War
►First
World War
►►Western
Front
►►►Trench
Warfare: 1914-1916
►►►Allied
Offensive: 1916
►►►Allied
Offensives: 1917
►►►German
Offensive: 1918
►►►Advance
to Victory: 1918
►►Siberia
►Second
World War
►►War
Against Japan
►►North
Africa
►►Italian
Campaign
►►►Sicily
►►►Southern
Italy
►►►The
Sangro and Moro
►►►Battles
of the FSSF
►►►Cassino
►►►Liri
Valley
►►►Advance
to Florence
►►►Gothic
Line
►►►Winter
Lines
►►North-West
Europe
►►►Normandy
►►►Southern
France
►►►Channel
Ports
►►►Scheldt
►►►Nijmegen
Salient
►►►Rhineland
►►►Final
Phase
►Korean
War
►Cold
War
►Gulf
War |
Operations |
|
Battle Honours |
Boer War
First World War
Western Front
Trench Warfare: 1914-1916
Allied Offensive: 1916
►Somme, 1916 |
1
Jul-18 Nov 16 |
►Albert |
.1-13
Jul 16 |
►Bazentin |
.14-17
Jul 16 |
►Pozieres |
.23
Jul-3 Sep 16 |
►Guillemont |
.3-6
Sep 16 |
►Ginchy |
.9
Sep 16 |
►Flers-Courcelette |
15-22
Sep 16 |
►Thiepval |
26-29
Sep 16 |
►Le Transloy |
.
1-18 Oct 16 |
Allied
Offensives: 1917
►Arras 1917 |
8
Apr-4 May 17 |
►Vimy, 1917 |
.9-14
Apr 17 |
►Arleux |
28-29 Apr 17 |
►Scarpe, 1917 |
.3-4
May17 |
►Hill 70 |
.15-25
Aug 17 |
►Messines, 1917 |
.7-14
Jun 17 |
►Ypres, 1917 |
..31
Jul-10 Nov 17 |
►Pilckem |
31
Jul-2 Aug 17 |
►Langemarck, 1917 |
.16-18
Aug 17 |
►Menin Road |
.20-25
Sep 17 |
►Polygon Wood |
26
Sep-3 Oct 17 |
►Broodseinde |
.4
Oct 17 |
►Poelcapelle |
.9
Oct 17 |
►Passchendaele |
.12
Oct 17 |
►Cambrai, 1917 |
20
Nov-3 Dec 17 |
German Offensive: 1918
►Somme, 1918 |
.21
Mar-5 Apr 18 |
►St. Quentin |
.21-23
Mar 18 |
►Bapaume, 1918 |
.24-25
Mar 18 |
►Rosieres |
.26-27
Mar 18 |
►Avre |
.4
Apr 18 |
►Lys |
.9-29
Apr 18 |
►Estaires |
.9-11
Apr 18 |
►Messines, 1918 |
.10-11
Apr 18 |
►Bailleul |
.13-15
Apr 18 |
►Kemmel |
.17-19
Apr 18 |
Advance to Victory: 1918
►Arras, 1918 |
.26
Aug-3 Sep 18 |
►Scarpe, 1918 |
26-30 Aug 18. |
►Drocourt-Queant |
.2-3
Sep 18 |
►Hindenburg Line |
.12
Sep-9 Oct 18 |
►Canal du Nord |
.27
Sep-2 Oct 18 |
►St. Quentin Canal |
.29
Sep-2 Oct 18 |
►Epehy |
3-5
Oct 18 |
►Cambrai, 1918 |
.8-9
Oct 18 |
►Valenciennes |
.1-2
Nov 18 |
►Sambre |
.4
Nov 18 |
►Pursuit to Mons |
.28 Sep-11Nov |
Second World War
War Against Japan
South-East Asia
Italian Campaign
Battle of Sicily
Southern
Italy
The Sangro and Moro
Battles of the FSSF
►Anzio |
22
Jan-22 May 44 |
►Rome |
.22
May-4 Jun 44 |
►Advance
|
.22
May-22 Jun 44 |
to the Tiber |
. |
►Monte Arrestino |
25
May 44 |
►Rocca Massima |
27
May 44 |
►Colle Ferro |
2
Jun 44 |
Cassino
►Cassino II |
11-18
May 44 |
►Gustav Line |
11-18
May 44 |
►Sant' Angelo in
|
13
May 44 |
Teodice |
. |
►Pignataro |
14-15 May 44 |
Liri Valley
►Hitler Line |
18-24 May 44 |
►Melfa Crossing |
24-25 May 44 |
►Torrice Crossroads |
30
May 44 |
Advance to Florence
Gothic Line
►Gothic Line |
25 Aug-22 Sep 44 |
►Monteciccardo |
27-28 Aug 44 |
►Point 204 (Pozzo Alto) |
31 Aug 44 |
►Borgo Santa Maria |
1 Sep 44 |
►Tomba di Pesaro |
1-2 Sep 44 |
Winter Lines
►Rimini Line |
14-21 Sep 44 |
►San Martino- |
14-18 Sep 44 |
San Lorenzo |
. |
►San Fortunato |
18-20 Sep 44 |
►Sant' Angelo |
11-15 Sep 44 |
in Salute |
. |
►Bulgaria Village |
13-14 Sep 44 |
►Pisciatello |
16-19 Sep 44 |
►Savio Bridgehead |
20-23
Sep 44 |
►Monte La Pieve |
13-19
Oct 44 |
►Monte Spaduro |
19-24 Oct 44 |
►Monte San Bartolo |
11-14
Nov 44 |
►Lamone Crossing |
2-13
Dec 44 |
►Capture of Ravenna |
3-4
Dec 44 |
►Naviglio Canal |
12-15 Dec 44 |
►Fosso Vecchio |
16-18 Dec 44 |
►Fosso Munio |
19-21 Dec 44 |
►Conventello- |
2-6 Jan 45 |
Comacchio |
. |
Northwest Europe
Battle of Normandy
►Quesnay Road |
10-11 Aug 44 |
►St. Lambert-sur- |
19-22 Aug 44 |
Southern France
Channel Ports
The Scheldt
Nijmegen Salient
Rhineland
►The
Reichswald |
8-13 Feb 45 |
►Waal
Flats |
8-15 Feb 45 |
►Moyland
Wood |
14-21 Feb 45 |
►Goch-Calcar
Road |
19-21 Feb 45 |
►The
Hochwald |
26
Feb- |
. |
4
Mar 45 |
►Veen |
6-10 Mar 45 |
►Xanten |
8-9
Mar 45 |
Final Phase
►The
Rhine |
23
Mar-1 Apr 45 |
►Emmerich-Hoch
|
28
Mar-1 Apr 45 |
Elten |
. |
Korean War
|
Domestic Missions |
►FLQ
Crisis |
International
Missions |
►ICCS
Vietnam 1973
►MFO
Sinai 1986- |
Peacekeeping |
►UNTEA |
W. N. Guinea 1963-1964 |
►ONUCA |
C. America
1989-1992 |
►UNTAC |
Cambodia
1992-1993 |
►UNMOP |
Prevlaka
1996-2001 |
|
Exercises |
|
Southern France
The campaign in
Southern France was a not uncontroversial phase of the North-west
Europe campaign. Canadian participation was minimal, and only one
unit (the 1st Canadian Special Service Battalion, the nation
national component of the bi-national
First Special
Service Force) received a battle honour for fighting there.
Background
The failure of the 15th Army Group
(that is to say, all Allied forces in Italy, consisting of the
British 8th Army and U.S. 5th Army) to evict the Germans from their
Winter Line by 1 January 1944 caused concern not only in the
Mediterranean, but interfered with the grand strategy of the war as
planned by the major powers at conferences in Casablanca (January
1943), Quebec (August 1943) and Cairo (November 1943).At Quebec, the
Combined Chiefs of Staff proposed that Allied Forces in the
Mediterranean could best support the landings in France (Operation
OVERLORD) by initiating offensive operations against southern
France. At Cairo, a major assault of no less than two divisions was
agreed to, in the same timeframe as OVERLORD, to be designated
Operation ANVIL. |
|
At the Tehran Conference
(November-December 1943), the decision was agreed to in consultation
with the Soviet Union. Priority was to be given to ANVIL and OVERLORD,
with target dates of May 1944. Planning began for the invasion of
Southern France on 6 December 1943 and General Sir Henry Maitland Wilson
assumed control of the planning in January, succeeding General
Eisenhower as Allied Commander-in-Chief, Mediterranean Theatre
(redesignated on 9 March 1944 Supreme Allied Commander, Mediterranean
Theatre). The U.S. 7th Army, inactive since the conclusion of the Sicily
campaign, took over detailed planning.1
A major assumption of the planning for ANVIL was that the Germans would
have withdrawn or been forced back to the line of prepared defences
running from Pisa-Rimini, where only moderate Allied forces might be
used to hold the Germans in place, freeing resources for use elsewhere.
Fighting on the Adriatic (such as at Orsogna and Ortona) and south of
Cassino were testimony to the unlikeliness of this condition being
fulfilled. The amphibious assault at Anzio was planned at Christmas,
1943 in the belief that the capture of Rome would spur German retirement
northward.
It was hoped that such an operation would turn the enemy's flank and
enforce his withdrawal north of Rome, for, as Mr. Churchill cabled to
Mr. Attlee from the meeting: "We cannot leave the Rome situation to
stagnate and fester for three months without crippling amalgamation of
`Anvil' and thus hampering `Overlord'. We cannot go to other tasks and
leave this unfinished job behind us." As we have seen, the Anzio
landings produced unexpectedly strong German reaction. "None of us",
writes General Wilson, "had sufficiently realized the strength of
political and prestige considerations which would induce the enemy to
reinforce his front south of Rome up to seventeen divisions to seal off
the bridgehead and even to expend much of his fighting strength in
counter-attacks to drive us into the sea. These bold and desperate
measures stopped the Fifth Army's advance on both its fronts, and
brought a reconsideration of the "Anvil" proposal. On 18 February, at a
meeting of General Wilson with his Commanders-in-Chief at Caserta, it
was agreed that overriding priority must be given to linking up the
bridgehead with the main effort and subsequently capturing Rome; the
projected operation against Southern France (which would eventually
build up to ten divisions) should be cancelled. The Supreme Commander
communicated these recommendations to the Combined Chiefs of Staff on 22
February, and asked for a fresh directive "to conduct operations with
the object of containing the maximum number of German troops in South
Europe", using the forces earmarked for "Anvil". The request was
promptly met. On the 26th General Wilson received a new directive,
approved by the President and the Prime Minister, which granted the
Italian campaign "overriding priority over all existing and future
operations in the Mediterranean" and gave it "first call on all
resources, land, sea and air" within the theatre. The whole situation
would be reviewed in a month's time."Anvil" was postponed. The Combined
Chiefs considered that to cancel the operation altogether would be
strategically unsound and contrary to the decisions reached at Teheran.
On 22 March, after receiving from General Wilson a further appreciation
of the Italian situation, the British Chiefs of Staff proposed that the
assault landing in Southern France "should be cancelled as an operation
but retained as a threat." The American Chiefs of Staff concurred on 19
April.
Planning for an all-out spring offensive in Italy was conducted in Italy
at the end of February 1944, with the bulk of the Allied force to be
concentrated west of the Appenines. The 5th Army was to be reduced to a
sector on the seaward flank, as far inland as the Liri River and
including the Anzio bridgehead, while the 8th Army’s main force
transferred inland from the Adriatic coast to a narrow sector opposite
Cassino and the entrance to the Liri Valley. The two armies maintained a
national character to ease logistical burdens, with U.S. and
U.S.-equipped French formations retained by the 5th Army and
British-equipped divisions (including Canadian, Indian, and Polish
forces) returning to the 8th Army.
The intention of the Army Group commander
was to secure the Anzio bridgehead, secure the Cassino spur and a
crossing over the Rapido River, then regroup for a major assault through
the Liri Valley in order to link up with the forces in the Anzio
bridgehead and precipitate the capture of Rome. On 15 March 1944 the New
Zealand Corps therefore attempted once again to take Cassino, lying in
ruins at the foot of Monte Cassino. Unsuccessful attacks ended on 25
March, bringing the First Battle of Cassino to a close. The battle had
raged since the II U.S. Corps first tried to take Cassino on 2 February,
followed by an attempt by the New Zealand Corps on 16 February, the
period when the famous Abbey on the crest of the mountain was levelled
by artillery and aerial bombardment. At the same time, the third major
German attack on the Anzio beachhead ran out of steam on 3 March 1944
and conditions along the front of the bridgehead passed into one of
active defence.
The change in the boundary between
the Fifth and Eighth Armies came into effect on 26 March, and
thereafter regrouping went steadily forward. The vast undertaking
could not be unduly hurried, for the troops in both armies,
exhausted with the winter campaign, had to be rested, re-equipped
and reinforced. The tentative date for the offensive was 10 May, a
timing calculated to ensure the best support being given to the
Normandy invasion. The schedule of reliefs and moves was completed
as planned and the eve of the attack found all formations ready in
their new positions. The Fifth Army was holding a sixteen-mile front
from the Tyrrhenian Sea to the Liri River with two corps-the United.
States 2nd Corps (Major General Geoffrey T. Keyes) on the coastal
flank and the Corps Expeditionnaire Francais (General of the Army
Alphonse Juin) in the mountainous region on the right. The Eighth
Army's sector extended for 55 miles from the American right boundary
to the Maiella Mountains, but its centre of gravity was well to the
left. From the Liri to the southern edge of Cassino was the 13th
Corps, with four divisions and an armoured brigade (the 1st Canadian
Armoured Brigade); on its immediate right, ready for the attack on
Cassino, was the 2nd Polish Corps, with two divisions and an
armoured brigade. In reserve behind the 13th Corps the 1st Canadian
Corps, comprising the 1st Canadian Infantry Division, the 5th
Canadian Armoured Division and the British 25th Tank Brigade,
brought to a total of eight divisions and three brigades the
striking force concentrated on a short ten-mile front. The Eighth
Army's right flank in the mountainous centre of the peninsula was
held by the 10th Corps, and in the dormant Adriatic sector was the
5th Corps, placed directly under the command of General Alexander's
headquarters.2
Operation
ANVIL Approved
After the Allied successes in the Liri
Valley and the breakout from Anzio, culminating in the capture of Rome
on 4 June 1944, General Alexander (commanding the 15th Army Group) was
empowered to set distant objectives for the forces in Italy, setting
sights as far north as Florence-Bibbiena-Arezzo for the 8th Army and
Pisa-Lucca-Pistoia for the 5th Army, approving "extreme risks" for the
securing of the areas in the region of the middle and upper Arno and
Tuscany, deemed vital, with all speed before the Germans could
reorganize or reinforce. Reorganization of both armies followed, and
Allied pressure on the Germans produced some measure of success.
Strategically, however, the Supreme Allied Commander, Mediterranean
(General Wilson) and the Commander-in-Chief of forces in theatre lost
the battle to retain forces just when they were needed most. Despite
given an overriding priority on resources in February, and the
cancellation of ANVIL in April in order not to interfere with the
offensive operations in Italy, plans began to change.
On 22 May, General Wilson warned
Alexander of his intention to mount an amphibious operation no later
than mid-September, either in direct support of the ongoing struggle
north up the Italian mainland, in southern France, or even elsewhere.
He gave Alexander a tentative
schedule of dates for the release to A.F.H.Q. of the necessary
formations for this undertaking. For the next six weeks, while the
Combined Chiefs strove to reconcile British and American views on
"Anvil", the C.-in-C. had to carry on without knowing whether he was
to lose four French and three American divisions. "This
uncertainty", he writes, "was a very great handicap to our planning,
and its psychological effect on the troops expecting to be
withdrawn, especially the French, was undoubtedly serious." In an
appreciation to General Wilson on 7 June Alexander pointed out two
alternative courses that he might take. After breaking the Pisa-Rimini
line, he could either bring his offensive to a halt and so free
resources for operations elsewhere, or if permitted to retain all
the forces which he then had in Italy, he could carry the offensive
into the Po Valley and form there a base for an advance into either
France or Austria. He warmly recommended the second as the course
likely to achieve his object of completing the destruction of the
German armed forces in Italy and rendering the greatest possible
assistance to the invasion of North-West Europe. "I have now two
highly organised and skilful Armies, capable of carrying out large
scale attacks and mobile operations in the closest co-operation . .
. ", he wrote. "Neither the Apennines nor even the Alps should prove
a serious obstacle to their enthusiasm and skill."
On 14 June the Combined Chiefs of
Staff notified General Wilson of their decision that an amphibious
operation on the scale planned for "Anvil" would be launched-either
against Southern France, Western France or at the head of the
Adriatic; General Alexander was immediately instructed to begin
withdrawing from action the 6th U.S. Corps Headquarters and the
divisions already earmarked for inclusion in the Seventh Army.
Wilson strongly urged adoption of the third alternative proposed by
the Combined Chiefs. He contended that an advance across the Po
Valley and through the Ljubljana Gap into Austria, with the
assistance of an amphibious operation against Trieste, would make
the best contribution to the success of General Eisenhower's
operations in the west. The claims of "Anvil", however, were not to
be denied. General Marshall had already pointed out to General
Wilson that the capture of Marseilles would provide an additional
major port through which some 40 or 50 divisions from the United
States, all of them ready for action, might be introduced into
France. General Eisenhower was firm in his desire for the operation
against Southern France, and on 2 July Wilson received a directive
from the Combined Chiefs of Staff that the assault was to be made on
15 August.3
The British desire to retain the
amphibious resources in Italy was in the end over-ruled; Prime Minister
Winston Churchill (who attempted at the eleventh hour to move the
landings to Brittany having no apparent military planning to back the
suggestion) personally observed the landings east of Toulon in Southern
France and wrote to His Majesty King George V:
There is no doubt that
Eisenhower's operations made a great diversion. The fact that this
is the precise opposite of what was intended need not be stressed at
the present time.4
The landings were a success, given that
much German strength in southern France had long before been redeployed
to combat the Allied landings in Normandy. Nonetheless, the operations
there were given priority over those in Italy, with a build-up of 10
divisions, simultaneous to Alexander's mission, unchanged, of the
destruction of German forces on the Italian mainland. The Allied
Combined Chiefs had hoped that continued pressure in Italy combined with
the ANVIL landings would precipitate German withdrawals to north-west
Italy and eliminate the need for further costly offensives.
"Whatever value the invasion of
Southern France may have had as a contribution to operations in
North-western Europe", Alexander was later to declare, "its effect
on the Italian campaign was disastrous. The Allied Armies in full
pursuit of a beaten enemy were called off from the chase, Kesselring
was given a breathing space to reorganize his scattered forces and I
was left with insufficient strength to break through the barrier of
the Apennines." Almost a full year after the landings in Sicily the
Italian campaign had reached its climax. "From the beginning",
observed the C.-in-C., "both Germans and Allies regarded Italy as a
secondary theatre and looked for the main decision to be given on
either the Eastern or Western front." Henceforth Allied commanders
in Italy were to feel increasingly the effects of this
subordination. But the main intention, to bring to battle the
maximum number of German troops, never varied, and in the ten months
of fighting that remained this object was relentlessly pursued.5
The 1st Canadian Special Service
Battalion in Southern France
After the capture of Rome, the First Special Service Force left the U.S.
5th Army to prepare for its role in Operation ANVIL - which in early
July was renamed Operation DRAGOON to provide greater security. Resting
12 miles southeast of Rome on the shore of Lake Albano only briefly, the
Force then trained for six weeks at the south end of the Gulf of Salerno
in preparation for its role in DRAGOON, culminating in a rehearsal
combined with French commandos on the Pontine Islands, 60 miles off of
Naples. On 11 August 1944 the Force departed Italy for staging areas in
Corsica.
DRAGOON had been in the detailed planning phase since early March. Under
the code-name "Force 163", the U.S. 7th Army Headquarters designed an
assault landing east of Marseilles by the U.S. 6th Corps, comprising the
American 3rd, 36th and 45th Divisions). French Commandos, naval and air
support would support the landings, and the French 2nd Corps (whose
divisions formerly made up the Corps Expeditionnaire Francais)
was to immediately follow up the landings, then build up once ashore to
comprise "Army B" (renamed in September to become the 1st French Army).
Prior to the 6th Corps' landings the First Special Service Force,
operating directly under the Seventh Army, was to remove a threat to the
left flank by capturing the German-held islands of Levant and Port Cros,
the two easternmost of the Iles d'Hyeres, seven miles off the French
coast The main amphibious assault was delivered at 8:00 a.m. on 15
August by the three American divisions on a fifteen-mile front between
Toulon and Cannes, the landings being watched by Mr. Churchill from the
deck of a British destroyer. Earlier that morning more than 5000 troops
of a combined British-American Airborne Task Force had dropped by
parachute some ten miles inland to block the enemy's reinforcement
routes from the interior. Extensive glider-landings followed; in all
9000 airborne personnel were carried over from the Rome airfields into
the bridgehead.
The Airborne Task Force was commanded by Major-General Robert T.
Frederick, newly promoted out of his command of the First Special
Service Force. The FSSF was not idle on 15 August, having sailed from
Corsica just before noon on 14 August aboard H.M.C.S. Prince Henry,
H.M.S. Prince Baudouin and five transport destroyers, with an escort of
five U.S. Navy torpedo boats. They reached station just before midnight,
close to three miles south of the Hyeres. The 15th of August was the
first anniversary of the FSSF's first operation in the Aleutians, and
they paddled ashore in rubber dinghies in the early hours, finding only
light resistance on Levant. The 2nd and 3rd Regiments beached on the
east shore, scaled 80-foot cliffs, then overran five-mile long island,
finding a battery on the eastern shore made of wooden guns and manned by
dummies. Force Headquarters landed on the island before the end of the
day.

A mile west, the 1st Regiment (two of the
Force's three Regiments were commanded in this period by Canadians, the
1st and the 3rd) resistance was harder to overcome on the smaller island
of Port Cros. The eastern half of the island was easily occupied, but a
group of fortifications in the port area, including a Napoleonic
emplacement known as Fort de l'Eminence, proved formidable. Salvoes of
8-inch naval gunfire and rockets from air support were unable to
neutralize the fort. With no heavy bomber support, it was not until
afternoon on 17 August when H.M.S. Ramillies was able to take station
and turn her 15-inch guns onto the fort. Canadian casualties at Levant
and Port Cros had totalled 10 killed and 32 wounded.
After relief by French garrison troops, the FSSF was transported to the
French mainland to re-enter operations to the west of Cannes, replacing
the 2nd Parachute Brigade (the British component of the 1st Airborne
Task Force). The main French and American forces (on 16 September
officially becoming the 6th Army Group) were by now driving the German
19th Army north through the Rhone valley while the three Regiments of
the FSSF embarked on a series of rapid movements up the Riviera coast,
covering a distance of 45 miles in a period of three weeks and arriving
almost on the Italian border.
The advance was conducted on foot, facing
light opposition on a ten-mile wide front, "each day bringing its quota
of two or three towns liberated, a number of machine-gun positions
destroyed, and a score or so of prisoners captured." The toughest action
occurred on 25 August at Villeneuve Loubet on the Loup River, 10 miles
east of Cannes, and a hot pursuit continued the Force crossing the Val
on the 30th without incident after seizing an inn east of the Loup that
had housed the G.O.C. of the enemy's 148th Division and staff. Once
across the Val, the coastal plain gave way to mountains on the other
side of Nice, and resistance again stiffened. Flanking units from the
First Airborne Task Force, to whom the FSSF reported, were relieved. On
3 September the 2nd Regiment replaced the 509th Parachute Infantry west
of Monaco (the principality itself was placed out of bounds) and the
coastal sector became the responsibility of Colonel Walker's FSSF. On 6
September, Force patrols, just two miles from the Italian border, found
Menton empty, and the Force moved into positions on 9 September from
which they would not move for seven weeks.
The German Nineteenth Army
succeeded in withdrawing in comparatively good order up the Rhone
Valley. On 11 September Patch's troops met Patton's, and the two
fronts were merged. On 15 September General Eisenhower took the
force from the Mediterranean under his command, and the 6th Army
Group (General Devers) became operational, taking over the southern
front. General de Lattre de Tassigny's First French Army (so
designated from 25 September) operated in this army group. On 15
September also the harbour of Marseilles was opened to large ships
and became available for the function for which Eisenhower had
required it. 205 But by that time his most urgent need was port
facilities in the north.6
The German 34th Division, replacing the
148th, was well-entrenched in what was known as the Little Maginot Line,
a series of fortifications that had served France well against the
Italian invasion in 1940. The FSSF reduced the forts one by one with the
aid of naval gunfire from American destroyers and the French battleship
Lorraine. Fort Castillon put up an especially prolonged fight, holding
out to the end of October until the garrison was able to withdraw into
Italy.
By the time the Little Maginot forts were reduced, the 6th Army Group
had advanced well to the north and the Vosges Mountains, preparing to
break into the Belfort Gap and move on the Rhine River. The forces left
behind on the Mediterranean coast found themselves with little to do,
exposed in mountainous terrain in cool, wet weather unlike their notions
of the "sunny Riviera." On 28 November the Force was relieved by the
Japanese-American 442nd Regimental Combat Team. Major-General
Frederick's 1st Airborne Task Force had been disbanded, its paratroops
broken up to reinforce other formations within the 1st Allied Airborne
Army. There was little requirement for highly trained specialists, and
while General Marshall, the U.S. Army's Chief of Staff, had pointed out
the FSSF's winter training at the Quebec Conference, no further missions
materialized for the Force in that role.
As its name indicates, the Force was
a highly specialized assault team, even though, as we have seen, it
had fought for considerable periods as normal infantry. That it
should continue to be employed in a general role was inevitably
regarded by many as a military waste. As early as January 1944, when
the provision of suitably trained reinforcements was creating a
difficult problem in Ottawa, the withdrawal of the Canadian
component had been seriously considered on- both sides of the
Atlantic. The Canadian viewpoint was that the special type of
training which the Canadian personnel had received could "be used to
better advantage for the common cause in prospective operations
being planned for the forces in the United Kingdom." A Canadian
withdrawal, however, would have meant breaking up the Force, which
was then fighting in the Anzio bridgehead. Neither the Combined
Chiefs of Staff nor the Commanders in the Mediterranean favoured
such a course. Accordingly arrangements were made to reinforce both
the Canadian and United States elements with non-parachutists. By
October, however, the feeling in Ottawa had grown that "the
continued employment of this Special Force on operations detached
from those upon which the main forces of the Canadian Army were
employed constituted a dispersion of our forces for which there is
no special necessity." When, therefore, the Department of National
Defence learned from Washington that SHAEF recommended the
disbandment of the First Special Service Force, it immediately gave
its approval.7
The Canadian members of the Force
participated in a final parade on 5 December and thereafter departed
Marseilles for Italy having served on operations in France for 107 days.
In that time, 30 Canadians had been killed, 156 wounded, and 4 taken
prisoner. The surviving Forcemen were accepted back into the Canadian
Army at Avellino, either as infantry reinforcements for 1st Canadian
Corps, or, if parachute trained (about two-thirds of the officers and
50% of the other ranks), sailing immediately for the United Kingdom to
join the 1st Canadian Parachute Battalion.
Battle Honours
The following Canadian
unit was awarded the Battle Honour "Southern France" for participation in these
actions:
Notes
-
Nicholson, Gerald Official History of the
Canadian Army in the Second World War: Volume II: The Canadians in
Italy
(Queen's Printer, Ottawa, ON, 1957)
p.387
-
Ibid, pp.389-390
-
Ibid, pp.463-464
-
Stacey, C.P. Official History of
the Canadian Army in the Second World War: Volume III: The Victory
Campaign: The Operations in North-west Europe 1944-45
(Queen's Printer, Ottawa, ON, 1960) p.141
-
Nicholson, Ibid, pp.464-465
-
Stacey, Ibid,
p.269
-
Nicholson,
Ibid, pp.670-671
|